4
A
:
{
203
NOTE
35
Sir G. Grindle saw the representatives at 3 p.m.
on Thursday the 9th of November. They were :-
Mr. Burroughs (of Gibson and Welldon), Mr.C.R.Burkill (Meller and Company) and Mr. J.V.C.Davis, Mr. Bushe and I were also present.
Mr. Burroughs opened with a general
tatement of
the position. He argued that conditions in HongKong were qui te different from those in this country, and referred to the question of war risk insurance.
-
?
Sir G. Grindle said that before the discussion went further it would in his opinion be useful if he Were to state the general position of the Imperial Government in the matter. He stated that it had been
necessary for war reasons for the Government of HongKong
to take the action which was taken as to the requisiti oni n
of ships. The Secretary of State's attitude as to this
action was that either it was legal or if it were not and for the sake of argument he was prepared to admitthat
it was hoplessly illegal, it must be made legal. The
Indemnity Ordinance was not a device of the HongKong
Government to meet their own special difficulties, but
was passed on the instructions of His Majesty's Govern-
ment, as similar Ordinances were passed in Colonies
similarly situated, and was intended to carry out the
deliberate intention and decision of His Majesty's
Government that shipowners in Hong Kong and elsewhere in the Colonies must not be placed in any way in a more favourable position than shipowers in this country. It had been suggested that the action of the HongKong
Government
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.